Thursday, July 26, 2012

Landmark Forum: A Supportive Positive Value System ? Article ...

It is imperative to mention that the services that are offered by the landmark education programs are geared towards making you a very productive person.

In life, we all need positive environments and operations that will give us the knowledge on how to be great people in the society. These are the supportive positive value systems that will make you better equipped with relevant experiences to tackle life issues. The landmark forum system is set to provide you with the invaluable system that will make you a more stable person with a solid foundation. The initial landmark forum will allow you to be conversant with the general operations of the landmark education operation. Using the principles that will be shared at the landmark forum, you will be able follow up the rest of the courses in the landmark education processes.

It is imperative to mention that the services that are offered by the landmark education programs are geared towards making you a very productive person. They are globally available to the interested parties, giving you the opportunity to take part in the program. The landmark forum content that will be shared will come in handy in ensuring that you utilize all your opportunities well. The course work that is offered at landmark education centers is founded on Werner Erhard and is set to make you gain the necessary experiences.

The topics that will be shared at the landmark forum are very practical guaranteeing you the chance to be well informed at the end of the initiative. You will also be able to establish great professional connections at the landmark education program that will build your portfolio so that you can maximize your potential in the future. This will make the landmark education Forum very beneficial to you and other people in the society.

One of the most important features for you to consider as you select the best value system, is to assess the quality of the content that will be shared. At landmark education operations, there is valid content that will be offered to you. This content is meant to offer a sound basis for making your decisions. The landmark forum flagship course has also been well designed to provide you with the necessary initial content that will ensure that you are well settled into the activities and operations at landmark education. Through this, the three-day initial program will be very productive offering you a chance to explore diverse topics with ease.

The landmark education programs are available in more than 120 cities globally. This allows the global audience to make solid arrangements on undertaking the initial landmark forum easily and then undertaking the rest of the courses thereafter. It is imperative to mention that the activities at landmark education centers are well organized giving you the assurance that you will gain value for you time. This value system is practical based so that you will be able to effectively grow through all the topics that will be covered. The landmark education process is not informational based but rather transformative, as you get involved in the entire experience and enhance your productivity rates.

Resources:
Emerson is the author of this article on Landmark Forum.
Find more information, about Landmark Education here

Source: http://companieslist.org/reference-education/landmark-forum-a-supportive-positive-value-system/

sotu

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Huawei's Emotion UI site goes live, not yet available outside of China

Android Central

We first heard about Emotion UI -- Huawei's new, custom interface -- back in May, ahead of it's supposed, planned release in June. The Chinese OEM now seems to be about ready to push it out though as of today, as the official site has gone live. Download links are present, but at the moment, only Chinese consumers can get the software. 

Emotion UI is compatible with Huawei devices running Android 4.0, and at this time only the Honor, Ascend P1 and Ascend P1E are showing as being supported. The P1 also still shows as "coming soon." 

Notably missing from that list, is the as yet un-released, Ascend D-Quad. It's highly likely that Emotion UI will be coming to the upcoming Huawei flagship too. 

Emotion UI promises to bring a (Chinese only) Voice Assistant, cloud services, an "intelligent contact finder," and unique homescreens, customizations and animations. From the images we've seen so far, it looks like it might not be too bad, it's a shame that for now at least, we don't get to play around with it. 

Source: Huawei (translated) via Unwired View



Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/oWYs0KcsDfg/story01.htm

ellsbury

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Mexico's leftists again question presidential vote

A man holds up a sign that reads in Spanish "No to electoral fraud" outside a hotel where Mexican presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD), gave a news conference in Mexico City, Monday, July 2, 2012. After official results showed Enrique Pena Nieto of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) winning 38 per cent of the vote with more than 92 per cent of the votes counted, Lopez Obrador has not conceded Sunday?s elections, telling his supporters Monday evening that, ?We can?t accept a fraudulent result,? a reference to his allegations that Pena Nieto exceeded campaign spending limits, bought votes in some states and benefited from favorable coverage in Mexico?s semi-monopolized television industry. (AP Photo/Alexandre Meneghini)

A man holds up a sign that reads in Spanish "No to electoral fraud" outside a hotel where Mexican presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD), gave a news conference in Mexico City, Monday, July 2, 2012. After official results showed Enrique Pena Nieto of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) winning 38 per cent of the vote with more than 92 per cent of the votes counted, Lopez Obrador has not conceded Sunday?s elections, telling his supporters Monday evening that, ?We can?t accept a fraudulent result,? a reference to his allegations that Pena Nieto exceeded campaign spending limits, bought votes in some states and benefited from favorable coverage in Mexico?s semi-monopolized television industry. (AP Photo/Alexandre Meneghini)

Mexican presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD), arrives for a press conference in Mexico City, Monday, July 2, 2012. After official results showed Enrique Pena Nieto of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) winning 38 per cent of the vote with more than 92 per cent of the votes counted, Lopez Obrador has not conceded Sunday?s elections, telling his supporters Monday evening that, ?We can?t accept a fraudulent result,? a reference to his allegations that Pena Nieto exceeded campaign spending limits, bought votes in some states and benefited from favorable coverage in Mexico?s semi-monopolized television industry. (AP Photo/Alexandre Meneghini)

Enrique Pena Nieto, candidate of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) and apparent winner of Mexico's presidential elections speaks with foreign correspondents in Mexico City, Monday, July 2, 2012. The party that ruled Mexico with a tight grip for most of the last century has sailed back into power, promising a government that will be modern, responsible and open to criticism. (AP Photo/Eduardo Verdugo)

Enrique Pena Nieto, candidate of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) and apparent winner of Mexico's presidential election, gestures while speaking with foreign correspondents in Mexico City, Monday, July 2, 2012. The party that ruled Mexico with a tight grip for most of the last century has sailed back into power, promising a government that will be modern, responsible and open to criticism. (AP Photo/Eduardo Verdugo)

(AP) ? Pre-election polls on Mexico's presidential vote had projected that leftist presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador would lose by a double-digit margin.

But with 99 percent of the vote tallied in the preliminary count, Lopez Obrador of the Democratic Revolution Party trails by just six percentage points behind the election's apparent victor, Enrique Pena Nieto of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI.

The narrower-than-expected margin is fueling suspicion among Lopez Obrador's followers about the fairness of the vote, and he refused Monday night to concede defeat ? just as he did when he lost a razor-thin race in the 2006 presidential race and set off months of political unrest. Although this time, he has not called his followers into the streets to protest.

Lopez Obrador argued from the start of the campaign that pollsters were manipulating pre-election surveys to favor Pena Nieto as a way to boost the idea that the PRI candidate was far out in front.

Pollsters denied that, and said Monday that they suspected some voters changed their minds and switched to Lopez Obrador in the final week before Sunday's election. Mexican electoral law bans the publication of polls just before elections, something the polling firms said prevented them from getting a last-minute snapshot of voter sentiment.

The leftist candidate also complained throughout the campaign that biased media favored Pena Nieto, particularly Mexico's semi-monopolized television industry.

"The media sponsored Pena Nieto, they manipulated, they deceived," Lopez Obrador said at a news conference Monday evening. "This was a really dirty election."

Lopez Obrador said he would not accept the preliminary election results reported by the Federal Elections Institute and would wait until Wednesday, when the official results are to be announced, before deciding what he will do.

"We will not accept a fraudulent result," he said.

Lopez Obrador said he probably would challenge Sunday's vote results, but didn't say if he would try to repeat the nearly two months of street blockades in Mexico City that he led in 2006 to protest his close loss to President Felipe Calderon of the conservative National Action Party that the leftist also attributed to fraud.

Pre-election polls said Pena Nieto was favored by 32 percent to 41 percent of voters, while Lopez Obrador had support ranging from nearly 24 percent to 25 percent. Josefina Vazquez Mota of the National Action Party was third at around 19 percent or 21 percent.

IFE's preliminary vote count, however, has produced a much tighter contest. Pena Nieto leads with 38 percent of the votes, while Lopez Obrador is much closer than predicted with 32 percent and Vazquez Mota has 25 percent.

"To say that more than 200 polls, including some that were done by some polling companies he trusted, were manipulated is absurd," said Roy Campos, president of the polling firm Mitofsky.

Campos said polls estimated correctly in what place each of the candidates would finish. The gap between Lopez Obrador and Pena Nieto narrowed because at least one in nine voters changes his or her mind at the last minute, he said.

"There is definitely an effect toward the end that we are not able to measure because the last survey is done the weekend before the election," Campos said.

Jorge Buendia of the polling firm Buendia and Laredo also said it appeared that some voters who initially supported Pena Nieto changed their minds.

"Sometimes we forget that people often tell you a preference without being completely convinced," Buendia said. "But it's not up to us as pollsters, or democrats, to decide that a convinced vote is superior to a doubtful vote."

Supporters of Lopez Obrador, who narrowly lost the 2006 election by a half percentage point, say the polls were "propaganda" used against him and many are urging him to declare the election a fraud.

"We have a situation where the numbers were very different from what the propaganda of the polls was spreading for three months," Manuel Camacho Solis, a former Mexico City mayor who was among Lopez Obrador's campaign coordinators in 2006 and now leads an informal coalition of leftist parties, told reporters Monday.

"They first prescribed us a difference of 25 points, then of 20, and toward the last days of the campaign, and almost in a generous way, they were talking of 15 percentage points."

Hundreds of young people gathered Monday at a monument along Mexico City's main Reforma Avenue to protest Pena Nieto's victory, which they called the result of electoral fraud.

"The election results are being manipulated by the media," said Vladimir Cervantes, a 23-year-old university student. "We will resist so that they don't make the fraud official."

The students said they knew of at least 500 reports of irregularities that were captured in photos and video, including the buying of votes.

"What we want is for the truth to come up and to stop Pena Nieto from taking the presidency," Cervantes said.

___

Associated Press writer Adriana Gomez Licon contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2012-07-03-LT-Mexico-Elections/id-19882dc392f6449fa8f2292f96e3b0ab

meteor showers 2012

As India's kids starve, $1.5B worth of grain rots

Every day some 3,000 Indian children die from illnesses related to malnutrition, and yet countless heaps of rodent-infested wheat and rice are rotting in fields across the north of their own country.

It is an extraordinary paradox created by a rigid regime of subsidies for grain farmers, a woeful lack of storage facilities and an inefficient, corruption-plagued public distribution system that fails millions of impoverished people.

And it is an embarrassment for the government led by the Congress party, which returned to power in 2009 thanks in large part to pledges of welfare for the poor, who make up about 40 percent of the 1.2 billion population.

Quite why the authorities could not simply offload the mountains of grain for free to fill empty stomachs is puzzling, but the explanation lies in the complex regulations that govern procurement and distribution.

"This is a case of criminal neglect by the government," said D. Raja, national secretary of the Communist Party of India, an opposition group. "The ruling party has been the worst manager of the demand-supply of food grains."

Officials say that, in all, about 6 million tons of grain worth at least $1.5 billion could perish. Analysts say the losses could be far higher because more than 19 million tons are now lying in the open, exposed to searing summer heat and monsoon rains.

Bumper harvests
Saddomajra, a village in the bread-basket state of Punjab, is one of the dumping grounds for the record stockpile of wheat that has accumulated after half a decade of bumper harvests in the world's second-largest producer of the grain.

Here there are thousands of sacks of decomposing wheat, occupying an area the size of a football field and towering in some places to the height of a house. Tarpaulins cover most of the mounds, but many of the bags are torn, spilling blackened grain blighted by fungus and insects.

"The wheat has been lying there for the past five years. It smells very bad," said Hakkam Singh, who works as a watchman at the open field. "Nobody steals it, but people use it to feed fish and poultry farms."

India floods displace 850,000 people

At another dump, on the outskirts of Punjab's Amritsar city, locals told Reuters that officials sometimes dip into the sacks of rotting grain to mix it with fresh wheat for distribution to the poor who hold ration cards.

  1. Only on msnbc.com

    1. Colorado wildfire relief: 'Beginning of the long haul'
    2. Romney camp complicates GOP's health care tax message
    3. Powerless storm victims hunt for a charge
    4. Sneak peek of Olympic Village: 'Not a five-star resort'
    5. Former Gitmo prisoner: How I see America
    6. Inside Colorado?s burn zone

In India the government buys rice and wheat from farmers at a guaranteed price, a support system akin to the subsidies that led to Europe's notorious butter mountains and milk lakes.

The government has raised the price it pays to buy wheat by more than 70 percent since 2007, which only encourages more production. As a result, stocks are now at an all-time high of about 50 million tons, 12 times more than the official target.

"It's related to pure economic security for the farmers," said Purnima Menon, a research fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute in New Delhi. "They make a safe choice of crops."

Rajiv Tandon, a senior adviser for health and nutrition at aid organization Save the Children in India, said that to diversify the country's food basket farmers should be offered incentives to grow vegetables and other cash crops.

'Dumped by a graveyard'
However, he said root-and-branch modernization is needed. The farm sector was transformed by the introduction of high-yielding seeds, fertilizers and irrigation during the Green Revolution nearly half a century ago, ending a dependence on imports, but it has seen only incremental reform ever since.

Storage is one of the biggest problems of all.

"For the last 25 years the storage capacity has not been upgraded at all," Tandon said. "Part of the grain is officially stored outside store houses, where the chance of rotting is high. There are often not enough sacks and tarpaulins, and sometimes it is dumped by a graveyard or cremation centre."

Grain stocks officially deemed as stored in government warehouses now stand at a record 82.4 million tons. However, that is about 20 million tons more than actual capacity, which means grain lying in the open is being passed off as "stored".

From the archives: Battle against extreme hunger is falling short

State-run Food Corp. of India (FCI), the main grain procurement agency, buys about one-third of total wheat output to run welfare programs and keep stocks for emergency needs.

What to do with the rest is a conundrum for the government, which is reluctant to sell wheat for less than the inflated support price it paid to farmers because it would put further strain on an already hefty fiscal deficit.

Recently it offered 6 million tons of rice and wheat to state administrations for the poor at cheaper rates, in addition to 55 million already earmarked for financial year 2012/13. But there were not many takers because state governments are grappling with budget overruns themselves.

Exporting wheat is not an attractive alternative.

After buying wheat from farmers and adding freight, storage and transport costs, the free on board (FOB) price is around $346 a ton. However, Indian wheat would only be competitive in the export market at around $260, which implies a loss - effectively a further subsidy, and this time to consumers in other countries - of $85-90 per ton for the government.

The brimming granaries forced India to lift a four-year-old ban on private exports last September, but lower global prices have scuppered those plans.

Traders say that even if India went all-out to export wheat it could at best sell 6-7 million tons a year because of transport bottlenecks and doubts about the quality of the grain.

Tainted?
New Delhi is considering the export of up to 3 million tons of wheat to sanctions-hit Iran, but traders say Tehran will not be falling over itself to buy because of concern that Indian grain may be tainted by fungal disease.

Last month the government decided to offer 3 million tons of wheat to local biscuit makers and flour millers at $205 a ton against the $225 it paid to farmers in 2012.

"Subsidizing our bread and biscuit makers is easier than subsidizing consumers of other countries," said a senior government official, who did not wish to be identified due to political criticism of a solution to the surplus that benefits private companies rather than the poor.

In China, a large portion of wheat stocks are channeled into the country's rapidly expanding animal feed sector, replacing more expensive corn. However, India has an exportable surplus of corn and its meat consumption is far lower, so there is little demand for wheat as a replacement for other grains.

A government-supported survey published earlier this year found that 42 percent of India's children under 5 are underweight, almost double that of sub-Saharan Africa. The finding led Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to admit that malnutrition was "a national shame".

The cause of this widespread malnutrition cannot be tied mechanically to a lack of staples like rice and wheat.

India's 'national shame': 4 in 10 kids malnourished

Indeed, many families living on less than $2 a day are fuelled and filled by subsidized carbohydrate-rich food like wheat chapatis. These lack the much-needed protein and other nutrients that come in more expensive food. Poor hygiene and contaminated water are also to blame because they cause illnesses like diarrhoea, which prevents nutrient absorption.

Still, there are real grain shortages in the poorest states.

Here the problem is an inefficient and corruption-prone distribution system. Eighteen months ago investigators said millions of dollars worth of grain meant for poor families had been siphoned off and sold locally and abroad in a scam involving hundreds of government officials.

In 2010 the Supreme Court urged the government to distribute grain free to the hungry rather than let it go to waste in warehouses and open fields, but that hasn't happened.

This is because state governments are reluctant to buy extra grain for distribution under the food welfare program and, even if they were, only people with under-the-poverty-line ration cards would be entitled to buy it in subsidized shops.

"The problem of rotting grains and the poor going hungry lies in the system itself," said Biraj Patnaik, principal adviser on food issues to the court.

The government is now planning a food security scheme that will guarantee cheap grain to 63.5 percent of the population.

However, critics see this as political gimmickry. They doubt that the new scheme will be less corrupt, more efficient or better targeted than current programs, and they suspect that the government will not be able to afford a plan that may cost as much as $12 billion in additional subsidies a year.

More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow World News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2012. Check for restrictions at: http://about.reuters.com/fulllegal.asp

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48039343/ns/world_news-south_and_central_asia/

solar storm